netdev - Re: [MPTCP][PATCH net 2/2] mptcp: cleanup for mptcp_pm_alloc_anno

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 9 Nov 2020 17:35:02 +0100
From:   Matthieu Baerts <matthieu.baerts@...sares.net>
To:     Geliang Tang <geliangtang@...il.com>,
        Mat Martineau <mathew.j.martineau@...ux.intel.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, mptcp@...ts.01.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [MPTCP][PATCH net 2/2] mptcp: cleanup for
 mptcp_pm_alloc_anno_list

Hi Geliang,

On 09/11/2020 14:59, Geliang Tang wrote:
> This patch added NULL pointer check for mptcp_pm_alloc_anno_list, and
> avoided similar static checker warnings in mptcp_pm_add_timer.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Geliang Tang <geliangtang@...il.com>
> Reviewed-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>

I think Dan reviewed the v1 of your patch -- without some modifications 
below -- but not the v2 nor this one.

> ---
>   net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c | 6 ++++--
>   1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c b/net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c
> index 03f2c28f11f5..dfc1bed4a55f 100644
> --- a/net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c
> +++ b/net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c
> @@ -266,7 +266,9 @@ static bool mptcp_pm_alloc_anno_list(struct mptcp_sock *msk,
>   {
>   	struct mptcp_pm_add_entry *add_entry = NULL;
>   	struct sock *sk = (struct sock *)msk;
> -	struct net *net = sock_net(sk);
> +
> +	if (!msk)
> +		return false;

As Dan mentioned on MPTCP ML, this check is not required: "msk" cannot 
be NULL here.

We can maybe keep the cleanup (only move sock_net() below) but I don't 
think we need or want this in -net.
I am not even sure we want it in net-next but why not :)
This could also be part of other refactors.

Cheers,
Matt
-- 
Tessares | Belgium | Hybrid Access Solutions
www.tessares.net