netdev - Re: [PATCH RFC] SUNRPC: Use zero-copy to perform socket send operations

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <9ce015245c916b2c90de72440a22f801142f2c6e.camel@hammerspace.com>
Date:   Mon, 9 Nov 2020 17:08:56 +0000
From:   Trond Myklebust <trondmy@...merspace.com>
To:     "linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org" <linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org>,
        "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        "chuck.lever@...cle.com" <chuck.lever@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] SUNRPC: Use zero-copy to perform socket send
 operations

On Mon, 2020-11-09 at 11:03 -0500, Chuck Lever wrote:
> Daire Byrne reports a ~50% aggregrate throughput regression on his
> Linux NFS server after commit da1661b93bf4 ("SUNRPC: Teach server to
> use xprt_sock_sendmsg for socket sends"), which replaced
> kernel_send_page() calls in NFSD's socket send path with calls to
> sock_sendmsg() using iov_iter.
> 
> Investigation showed that tcp_sendmsg() was not using zero-copy to
> send the xdr_buf's bvec pages, but instead was relying on memcpy.
> 
> Set up the socket and each msghdr that bears bvec pages to use the
> zero-copy mechanism in tcp_sendmsg.
> 
> Reported-by: Daire Byrne <daire@...g.com>
> BugLink: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=209439
> Fixes: da1661b93bf4 ("SUNRPC: Teach server to use xprt_sock_sendmsg
> for socket sends")
> Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@...cle.com>
> ---
>  net/sunrpc/socklib.c  |    5 ++++-
>  net/sunrpc/svcsock.c  |    1 +
>  net/sunrpc/xprtsock.c |    1 +
>  3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> This patch does not fully resolve the issue. Daire reports high
> softIRQ activity after the patch is applied, and this activity
> seems to prevent full restoration of previous performance.
> 
> 
> diff --git a/net/sunrpc/socklib.c b/net/sunrpc/socklib.c
> index d52313af82bc..af47596a7bdd 100644
> --- a/net/sunrpc/socklib.c
> +++ b/net/sunrpc/socklib.c
> @@ -226,9 +226,12 @@ static int xprt_send_pagedata(struct socket
> *sock, struct msghdr *msg,
>         if (err < 0)
>                 return err;
>  
> +       msg->msg_flags |= MSG_ZEROCOPY;
>         iov_iter_bvec(&msg->msg_iter, WRITE, xdr->bvec,
> xdr_buf_pagecount(xdr),
>                       xdr->page_len + xdr->page_base);
> -       return xprt_sendmsg(sock, msg, base + xdr->page_base);
> +       err = xprt_sendmsg(sock, msg, base + xdr->page_base);
> +       msg->msg_flags &= ~MSG_ZEROCOPY;
> +       return err;
>  }
>  
>  /* Common case:
> diff --git a/net/sunrpc/svcsock.c b/net/sunrpc/svcsock.c
> index c2752e2b9ce3..c814b4953b15 100644
> --- a/net/sunrpc/svcsock.c
> +++ b/net/sunrpc/svcsock.c
> @@ -1176,6 +1176,7 @@ static void svc_tcp_init(struct svc_sock *svsk,
> struct svc_serv *serv)
>                 svsk->sk_datalen = 0;
>                 memset(&svsk->sk_pages[0], 0, sizeof(svsk-
> >sk_pages));
>  
> +               sock_set_flag(sk, SOCK_ZEROCOPY);
>                 tcp_sk(sk)->nonagle |= TCP_NAGLE_OFF;
>  
>                 set_bit(XPT_DATA, &svsk->sk_xprt.xpt_flags);
> diff --git a/net/sunrpc/xprtsock.c b/net/sunrpc/xprtsock.c
> index 7090bbee0ec5..343c6396b297 100644
> --- a/net/sunrpc/xprtsock.c
> +++ b/net/sunrpc/xprtsock.c
> @@ -2175,6 +2175,7 @@ static int xs_tcp_finish_connecting(struct
> rpc_xprt *xprt, struct socket *sock)
>  
>                 /* socket options */
>                 sock_reset_flag(sk, SOCK_LINGER);
> +               sock_set_flag(sk, SOCK_ZEROCOPY);
>                 tcp_sk(sk)->nonagle |= TCP_NAGLE_OFF;
>  
>                 xprt_clear_connected(xprt);
> 
> 
I'm thinking we are not really allowed to do that here. The pages we
pass in to the RPC layer are not guaranteed to contain stable data
since they include unlocked page cache pages as well as O_DIRECT pages.

-- 
Trond Myklebust
Linux NFS client maintainer, Hammerspace
trond.myklebust@...merspace.com