netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next v1] net: phy: spi_ks8995: Do not overwrite SPI mode flags

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAGngYiWUJ=bdJVMjzXBOc54H4Ubx5vQmaFnUbAWUjhaZ8nvP3A@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 9 Nov 2020 17:19:48 -0500
From:   Sven Van Asbroeck <thesven73@...il.com>
To:     Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc:     Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
        Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
        Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v1] net: phy: spi_ks8995: Do not overwrite SPI
 mode flags

On Mon, Nov 9, 2020 at 5:04 PM Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> Yup

Just a minute. Earlier in the thread, Andrew Lunn is suggesting I
create a new spi helper function, and cross-post to the spi group(s).

That doesn't sound like a minimal fix, should it go to net or net-next?

Thanks,
Sven