[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMZdPi-5Qp7jOHDZLZoWKJ4zwU6Sa9ULAts0eY6ObCu91Awx+w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2020 09:49:24 +0100
From: Loic Poulain <loic.poulain@...aro.org>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>,
cjhuang@...eaurora.org,
Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] net: qrtr: Add distant node support
Hi Jakub,
On Sun, 8 Nov 2020 at 01:26, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 6 Nov 2020 18:33:25 +0100 Loic Poulain wrote:
> > QRTR protocol allows a node to communicate with an other non-immediate
> > node via an intermdediate immediate node acting as a 'bridge':
> >
> > node-0 <=> node-1 <=> node-2
> >
> > This is currently not supported in this upstream version and this
> > series aim to fix that.
> >
> > This series is V2 because changes 1, 2 and 3 have already been submitted
> > separately on LKML.
>
> Looks like patch 1 is a bug fix and patches 2-5 add a new feature.
> Is that correct?
That's correct, though strictly speaking 2-5 are also bug fix since remote node
communication is supposed to be supported in QRTR to be compatible with
other implementations (downstream or private implementations).
> If so first one needs to go to net and then onto 5.10, and the rest
> to net-next for 5.11.
I'm can split that into two series so that you can dispatch them at
your convenience.
Regards,
Loic
Powered by blists - more mailing lists