[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201110072309.GA6508@ogabbay-VM.habana-labs.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2020 09:23:10 +0200
From: Oded Gabbay <ogabbay@...nel.org>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc: Parav Pandit <parav@...dia.com>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
"Ertman, David M" <david.m.ertman@...el.com>,
"alsa-devel@...a-project.org" <alsa-devel@...a-project.org>,
Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>,
linux-rdma <linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>,
Doug Ledford <dledford@...hat.com>,
Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Ranjani Sridharan <ranjani.sridharan@...ux.intel.com>,
Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com>,
Fred Oh <fred.oh@...ux.intel.com>,
Parav Pandit <parav@...lanox.com>,
"Saleem, Shiraz" <shiraz.saleem@...el.com>,
"Patil, Kiran" <kiran.patil@...el.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Leon Romanovsky <leonro@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 01/10] Add auxiliary bus support
On Fri, Nov 06, 2020 at 07:35:37PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 05, 2020 at 08:37:14PM +0000, Parav Pandit wrote:
>
> > > > This example describes the mlx5 PCI subfunction use case.
> > > > I didn't follow your question about 'explicit example'.
> > > > What part is missing to identify it as explicit example?
>
> > > Specifically listing "mlx5" so if someone reading this document thinks to
> > > themselves "hey mlx5 sounds like my use case" they can go grep for that.
>
> > Ah, I see.
> > "mlx5" is not listed explicitly, because it is not included in this patchset.
> > In various previous discussions in this thread, mlx5 subfunction use case is described that justifies the existence of the bus.
> > I will be happy to update this documentation once mlx5 subfunction will be part of kernel so that grep actually shows valid output.
> > (waiting to post them as it uses auxiliary bus :-)).
>
> For ease of review if there's a new version it might be as well to just
> reference it anyway, hopefully the mlx5 code will be merged fairly
> quickly once the bus itself is merged. It's probably easier all round
> than adding the reference later, it seems more likely that mlx5 will get
> merged than that it'll fall by the wayside.
Another use-case for this patch-set is going to be the habanalabs driver.
The GAUDI ASIC is a PCI H/W accelerator for deep-learning which also exposes
network ports.We are going to use this auxiliary-bus feature to separate our
monolithic driver into several parts that will reside in different subsystems
and communicate between them through the bus.
Thanks,
Oded
Powered by blists - more mailing lists