[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20201110102553.1924232-1-idosch@idosch.org>
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2020 12:25:53 +0200
From: Ido Schimmel <idosch@...sch.org>
To: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org, dsahern@...il.com,
mlxsw@...dia.com, Ido Schimmel <idosch@...dia.com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next] ipv4: Set nexthop flags in a more consistent way
From: Ido Schimmel <idosch@...dia.com>
Be more consistent about the way in which the nexthop flags are set and
set them in one go.
Suggested-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@...dia.com>
---
RTNH_F_DEAD and RTNH_F_LINKDOWN are set separately above, so I decided
to keep them as-is.
---
net/ipv4/fib_semantics.c | 7 ++-----
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/ipv4/fib_semantics.c b/net/ipv4/fib_semantics.c
index f70b9a0c4957..7612ff6111a7 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/fib_semantics.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/fib_semantics.c
@@ -1641,11 +1641,8 @@ int fib_nexthop_info(struct sk_buff *skb, const struct fib_nh_common *nhc,
break;
}
- *flags |= (nhc->nhc_flags & RTNH_F_ONLINK);
- if (nhc->nhc_flags & RTNH_F_OFFLOAD)
- *flags |= RTNH_F_OFFLOAD;
- if (nhc->nhc_flags & RTNH_F_TRAP)
- *flags |= RTNH_F_TRAP;
+ *flags |= (nhc->nhc_flags &
+ (RTNH_F_ONLINK | RTNH_F_OFFLOAD | RTNH_F_TRAP));
if (!skip_oif && nhc->nhc_dev &&
nla_put_u32(skb, RTA_OIF, nhc->nhc_dev->ifindex))
--
2.26.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists