lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3b851462d9bfd914aeb9f5b432e4c076f6c330f3.camel@sipsolutions.net>
Date:   Tue, 10 Nov 2020 18:35:07 +0100
From:   Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
To:     Claire Chang <tientzu@...omium.org>, davem@...emloft.net,
        kuba@...nel.org, hdegoede@...hat.com, marcel@...tmann.org
Cc:     linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rfkill: Fix use-after-free in rfkill_resume()

On Tue, 2020-11-10 at 16:49 +0800, Claire Chang wrote:
> If a device is getting removed or reprobed during resume, use-after-free
> might happen. For example, h5_btrtl_resume()[drivers/bluetooth/hci_h5.c]
> schedules a work queue for device reprobing. During the reprobing, if
> rfkill_set_block() in rfkill_resume() is called after the corresponding
> *_unregister() and kfree() are called, there will be an use-after-free
> in hci_rfkill_set_block()[net/bluetooth/hci_core.c].


Not sure I understand. So you're saying

 * something (h5_btrtl_resume) schedules a worker
 * said worker run, when it runs, calls rfkill_unregister()
 * somehow rfkill_resume() still gets called after this

But that can't really be right, device_del() removes it from the PM
lists?

johannes


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ