[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3e87038f-9e2e-676c-a000-0e6c0e8b6ae4@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2020 14:13:47 -0800
From: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
To: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...il.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, Ray Jui <rjui@...adcom.com>,
Scott Branden <sbranden@...adcom.com>,
"maintainer:BROADCOM IPROC ARM ARCHITECTURE"
<bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com>,
Hauke Mehrtens <hauke@...ke-m.de>,
Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@...il.com>,
"open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS"
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"moderated list:BROADCOM IPROC ARM ARCHITECTURE"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Kurt Kanzenbach <kurt@...-computers.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/10] ARM: dts: BCM5301X: Provide defaults ports
container node
On 11/10/20 2:12 PM, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 09, 2020 at 07:31:08PM -0800, Florian Fainelli wrote:
>> Provide an empty 'ports' container node with the correct #address-cells
>> and #size-cells properties. This silences the following warning:
>>
>> arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm4708-asus-rt-ac56u.dt.yaml:
>> ethernet-switch@...07000: 'oneOf' conditional failed, one must be fixed:
>> 'ports' is a required property
>> 'ethernet-ports' is a required property
>> From schema:
>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/dsa/b53.yaml
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
>> ---
>> arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm5301x.dtsi | 4 ++++
>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm5301x.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm5301x.dtsi
>> index 807580dd89f5..89993a8a6765 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm5301x.dtsi
>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm5301x.dtsi
>> @@ -489,6 +489,10 @@ srab: ethernet-switch@...07000 {
>> status = "disabled";
>>
>> /* ports are defined in board DTS */
>> + ports {
>> + #address-cells = <1>;
>> + #size-cells = <0>;
>> + };
>
> This look a bit 'lone wolf' here. Not sure how much time you intend to
> spend on this, but FWIW, others prefer to declare all ports in the SoC
> DTSI with status = "disabled", and just enable the ones used per-board,
> and add labels and PHY handles also per-board. Example: fsl-ls1028a.dtsi
> and fsl-ls1028a-rdb.dts.
That's a good suggestion, I could do that.
--
Florian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists