[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2020 09:37:38 -0300
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
To: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@...com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>,
Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
KP Singh <kpsingh@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv6 bpf] bpf: Move iterator functions into special init
section
Em Wed, Nov 11, 2020 at 12:26:29PM +0100, Daniel Borkmann escreveu:
> On 11/10/20 4:40 PM, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> > With upcoming changes to pahole, that change the way how and
> > which kernel functions are stored in BTF data, we need a way
> > to recognize iterator functions.
> >
> > Iterator functions need to be in BTF data, but have no real
> > body and are currently placed in .init.text section, so they
> > are freed after kernel init and are filtered out of BTF data
> > because of that.
> >
> > The solution is to place these functions under new section:
> > .init.bpf.preserve_type
> >
> > And add 2 new symbols to mark that area:
> > __init_bpf_preserve_type_begin
> > __init_bpf_preserve_type_end
> >
> > The code in pahole responsible for picking up the functions will
> > be able to recognize functions from this section and add them to
> > the BTF data and filter out all other .init.text functions.
> >
> > Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
> > Suggested-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>
> > Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
>
> LGTM, applied, thanks! Also added a reference to the pahole commit
Applied to what branch? I'm trying to test it now :-)
- Arnaldo
> to the commit log so that this info doesn't get lost in the void
> plus carried over prior Acks given nothing changed logically in the
> patch.
>
> P.s.: I've been wondering whether we also need to align the begin/end
> symbols via ALIGN_FUNCTION() in case ld might realign to a different
> boundary on later passes but this seems neither the case for .init.text
> right now, likely since it doesn't matter for kallsyms data in our
> particular case.
--
- Arnaldo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists