[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1605071026-25906-1-git-send-email-kaixuxia@tencent.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2020 13:03:46 +0800
From: xiakaixu1987@...il.com
To: ast@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net, kafai@...com,
songliubraving@...com, yhs@...com, andrii@...nel.org,
john.fastabend@...il.com, kpsingh@...omium.org
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Kaixu Xia <kaixuxia@...cent.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3] bpf: Fix unsigned 'datasec_id' compared with zero in check_pseudo_btf_id
From: Kaixu Xia <kaixuxia@...cent.com>
The unsigned variable datasec_id is assigned a return value from the call
to check_pseudo_btf_id(), which may return negative error code.
Fixes coccicheck warning:
./kernel/bpf/verifier.c:9616:5-15: WARNING: Unsigned expression compared with zero: datasec_id > 0
Reported-by: Tosk Robot <tencent_os_robot@...cent.com>
Signed-off-by: Kaixu Xia <kaixuxia@...cent.com>
---
v3:
-put the changes on the proper place.
v2:
-split out datasec_id definition into a separate line.
kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
index 6200519582a6..6204ec705d80 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -9572,12 +9572,13 @@ static int check_pseudo_btf_id(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
struct bpf_insn *insn,
struct bpf_insn_aux_data *aux)
{
- u32 datasec_id, type, id = insn->imm;
const struct btf_var_secinfo *vsi;
const struct btf_type *datasec;
const struct btf_type *t;
const char *sym_name;
bool percpu = false;
+ u32 type, id = insn->imm;
+ s32 datasec_id;
u64 addr;
int i;
--
2.20.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists