[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201111164314.50eff5d8@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.dhcp.thefacebook.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2020 16:43:14 -0800
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Vincent Bernat <vincent@...nat.ch>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Alexey Kuznetsov <kuznet@....inr.ac.ru>,
Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
Subject: Re: net: evaluate net.ipvX.conf.all.* sysctls
On Sat, 7 Nov 2020 20:35:12 +0100 Vincent Bernat wrote:
> Some per-interface sysctls are ignoring the "all" variant. This
> patchset fixes some of them when such a sysctl is handled as a
> boolean. This includes:
>
> - net.ipvX.conf.all.disable_policy
> - net.ipvX.conf.all.disable_policy.disable_xfrm
> - net.ipv4.conf.all.proxy_arp_pvlan
> - net.ipvX.conf.all.ignore_routes_with_linkdown
>
> Two sysctls are still ignoring the "all" variant as it wouldn't make
> much sense for them:
>
> - net.ipv4.conf.all.tag
> - net.ipv4.conf.all.medium_id
>
> Ideally, the "all" variant should be removed, but there is no simple
> alternative to DEVINET_SYSCTL_* macros that would allow one to not
> expose and "all" entry.
Applied to net-next, thanks.
Let's see if anyone complains..
Powered by blists - more mailing lists