lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 12 Nov 2020 17:54:30 +0200
From:   Tariq Toukan <ttoukan.linux@...il.com>
To:     Ido Schimmel <idosch@...sch.org>
Cc:     "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Jay Vosburgh <j.vosburgh@...il.com>,
        Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@...il.com>,
        Andy Gospodarek <andy@...yhouse.net>,
        Moshe Shemesh <moshe@...dia.com>,
        Itay Aveksis <itayav@...dia.com>,
        Ran Rozenstein <ranro@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: bug report: WARNING in bonding



On 11/12/2020 5:46 PM, Ido Schimmel wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 12, 2020 at 05:38:44PM +0200, Tariq Toukan wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> In the past ~2-3 weeks, we started seeing the following WARNING and traces
>> in our regression testing systems, almost every day.
>>
>> Reproduction is not stable, and not isolated to a specific test, so it's
>> hard to bisect.
>>
>> Any idea what could this be?
>> Or what is the suspected offending patch?
> 
> Do you have commit f8e48a3dca06 ("lockdep: Fix preemption WARN for spurious
> IRQ-enable")? I think it fixed the issue for me
> 

We do have it. Yet issue still exists.
Thanks.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ