[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5fad928748443_2a6120855@john-XPS-13-9370.notmuch>
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2020 11:52:39 -0800
From: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>
To: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>, ast@...nel.org,
jakub@...udflare.com
Cc: bpf@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [bpf PATCH 3/5] bpf, sockmap: Avoid returning unneeded EAGAIN
when redirecting to self
Daniel Borkmann wrote:
> On 11/7/20 8:38 PM, John Fastabend wrote:
> > If a socket redirects to itself and it is under memory pressure it is
> > possible to get a socket stuck so that recv() returns EAGAIN and the
> > socket can not advance for some time. This happens because when
> > redirecting a skb to the same socket we received the skb on we first
> > check if it is OK to enqueue the skb on the receiving socket by checking
> > memory limits. But, if the skb is itself the object holding the memory
> > needed to enqueue the skb we will keep retrying from kernel side
> > and always fail with EAGAIN. Then userspace will get a recv() EAGAIN
> > error if there are no skbs in the psock ingress queue. This will continue
> > until either some skbs get kfree'd causing the memory pressure to
> > reduce far enough that we can enqueue the pending packet or the
> > socket is destroyed. In some cases its possible to get a socket
> > stuck for a noticable amount of time if the socket is only receiving
> > skbs from sk_skb verdict programs. To reproduce I make the socket
> > memory limits ridiculously low so sockets are always under memory
> > pressure. More often though if under memory pressure it looks like
> > a spurious EAGAIN error on user space side causing userspace to retry
> > and typically enough has moved on the memory side that it works.
> >
> > To fix skip memory checks and skb_orphan if receiving on the same
> > sock as already assigned.
> >
> > For SK_PASS cases this is easy, its always the same socket so we
> > can just omit the orphan/set_owner pair.
> >
> > For backlog cases we need to check skb->sk and decide if the orphan
> > and set_owner pair are needed.
> >
> > Fixes: 51199405f9672 ("bpf: skb_verdict, support SK_PASS on RX BPF path")
> > Signed-off-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>
> > ---
> > net/core/skmsg.c | 72 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
> > 1 file changed, 53 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/net/core/skmsg.c b/net/core/skmsg.c
> > index fe44280c033e..580252e532da 100644
> > --- a/net/core/skmsg.c
> > +++ b/net/core/skmsg.c
> > @@ -399,38 +399,38 @@ int sk_msg_memcopy_from_iter(struct sock *sk, struct iov_iter *from,
> > }
> > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(sk_msg_memcopy_from_iter);
> >
> > -static int sk_psock_skb_ingress(struct sk_psock *psock, struct sk_buff *skb)
> > +static struct sk_msg *sk_psock_create_ingress_msg(struct sock *sk,
> > + struct sk_buff *skb)
> > {
> > - struct sock *sk = psock->sk;
> > - int copied = 0, num_sge;
> > struct sk_msg *msg;
> >
> > if (atomic_read(&sk->sk_rmem_alloc) > sk->sk_rcvbuf)
> > - return -EAGAIN;
> > + return NULL;
> > +
> > + if (!sk_rmem_schedule(sk, skb, skb->len))
>
> Isn't accounting always truesize based, thus we should fix & convert all skb->len
> to skb->truesize ?
Right good catch, will fix in v2.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists