netdev - Re: [PATCH bpf-next v5 01/34] mm: memcontrol: use helpers to read page's memcg data

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 13 Nov 2020 06:25:53 -0800
From:   Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@...gle.com>
To:     Roman Gushchin <guro@...com>
Cc:     Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
        bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
        linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Kernel Team <kernel-team@...com>,
        Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
        Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v5 01/34] mm: memcontrol: use helpers to read
 page's memcg data

On Thu, Nov 12, 2020 at 8:02 PM Roman Gushchin <guro@...com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Nov 12, 2020 at 07:25:48PM -0800, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 12, 2020 at 7:18 PM Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, 12 Nov 2020 19:04:56 -0800 Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Thu, Nov 12, 2020 at 04:26:10PM -0800, Roman Gushchin wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > These patches are not intended to be merged through the bpf tree.
> > > > > They are included into the patchset to make bpf selftests pass and for
> > > > > informational purposes.
> > > > > It's written in the cover letter.
> > > > ...
> > > > > Maybe I had to just list their titles in the cover letter. Idk what's
> > > > > the best option for such cross-subsystem dependencies.
> > > >
> > > > We had several situations in the past releases where dependent patches
> > > > were merged into multiple trees. For that to happen cleanly from git pov
> > > > one of the maintainers need to create a stable branch/tag and let other
> > > > maintainers pull that branch into different trees. This way the sha-s
> > > > stay the same and no conflicts arise during the merge window.
> > > > In this case sounds like the first 4 patches are in mm tree already.
> > > > Is there a branch/tag I can pull to get the first 4 into bpf-next?
> > >
> > > Not really, at present.  This is largely by design, although it does cause
> > > this problem once or twice a year.
> > >
> > > These four patches:
> > >
> > > mm-memcontrol-use-helpers-to-read-pages-memcg-data.patch
> > > mm-memcontrol-slab-use-helpers-to-access-slab-pages-memcg_data.patch
> > > mm-introduce-page-memcg-flags.patch
> > > mm-convert-page-kmemcg-type-to-a-page-memcg-flag.patch
> > >
> > > are sufficiently reviewed - please pull them into the bpf tree when
> > > convenient.  Once they hit linux-next, I'll drop the -mm copies and the
> > > bpf tree maintainers will then be responsible for whether & when they
> > > get upstream.
> >
> > That's certainly an option if they don't depend on other patches in the mm tree.
> > Roman probably knows best ?
>
> Yes, they are self-contained and don't depend on any patches in the mm tree.
>

The patch "mm, kvm: account kvm_vcpu_mmap to kmemcg" in mm tree
depends on that series.