[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1605291013-22575-3-git-send-email-alan.maguire@oracle.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2020 18:10:12 +0000
From: Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@...cle.com>
To: ast@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net, andrii@...nel.org
Cc: kafai@...com, songliubraving@...com, yhs@...com,
john.fastabend@...il.com, kpsingh@...omium.org,
rostedt@...dmis.org, mingo@...hat.com, haoluo@...gle.com,
jolsa@...nel.org, quentin@...valent.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
bpf@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [RFC bpf-next 2/3] libbpf: bpf__find_by_name[_kind] should use btf__get_nr_types()
When operating on split BTF, btf__find_by_name[_kind] will not
iterate over all types since they use btf->nr_types to show
the number of types to iterate over. For split BTF this is
the number of types _on top of base BTF_, so it will
underestimate the number of types to iterate over, especially
for vmlinux + module BTF, where the latter is much smaller.
Use btf__get_nr_types() instead.
Signed-off-by: Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@...cle.com>
---
tools/lib/bpf/btf.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/btf.c b/tools/lib/bpf/btf.c
index 2d0d064..0fccf4b 100644
--- a/tools/lib/bpf/btf.c
+++ b/tools/lib/bpf/btf.c
@@ -679,7 +679,7 @@ __s32 btf__find_by_name(const struct btf *btf, const char *type_name)
if (!strcmp(type_name, "void"))
return 0;
- for (i = 1; i <= btf->nr_types; i++) {
+ for (i = 1; i <= btf__get_nr_types(btf); i++) {
const struct btf_type *t = btf__type_by_id(btf, i);
const char *name = btf__name_by_offset(btf, t->name_off);
@@ -698,7 +698,7 @@ __s32 btf__find_by_name_kind(const struct btf *btf, const char *type_name,
if (kind == BTF_KIND_UNKN || !strcmp(type_name, "void"))
return 0;
- for (i = 1; i <= btf->nr_types; i++) {
+ for (i = 1; i <= btf__get_nr_types(btf); i++) {
const struct btf_type *t = btf__type_by_id(btf, i);
const char *name;
--
1.8.3.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists