netdev - Re: [PATCH v10 net-next 3/3] net/sched: act_frag: add implict packet fragment support.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20201113022522.GH3913@localhost.localdomain>
Date:   Thu, 12 Nov 2020 23:25:22 -0300
From:   Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@...il.com>
To:     Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc:     wenxu@...oud.cn, vladbu@...dia.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 net-next 3/3] net/sched: act_frag: add implict packet
 fragment support.

On Thu, Nov 12, 2020 at 02:20:58PM -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Nov 2020 11:24:57 +0800 wenxu@...oud.cn wrote:
> > v7-v10: fix __rcu warning 
> 
> Are you reposting stuff just to get it build tested?
> 
> This is absolutely unacceptable.

I don't know if that's the case, but maybe we could have a shadow
mailing list just for that? So that bots would monitor and would run
(almost) the same tests are they do here. Then when patches are posted
here, a list that people actually subscribe, they are already more
ready. The bots would have to email an "ok" as well, but that's
implementation detail already. Not that developers shouldn't test
before posting, but the bots are already doing some tests that may be
beyond of what one can think of testing before posting.