netdev - Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH next-queue v2 3/3] igc: Add support for PTP getcrosststamp()

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20201113032451.GB32138@hoboy.vegasvil.org>
Date:   Thu, 12 Nov 2020 19:24:51 -0800
From:   Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>
To:     Vinicius Costa Gomes <vinicius.gomes@...el.com>
Cc:     Miroslav Lichvar <mlichvar@...hat.com>,
        intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org, andre.guedes@...el.com,
        linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        bhelgaas@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH next-queue v2 3/3] igc: Add support for
 PTP getcrosststamp()

On Thu, Nov 12, 2020 at 03:46:12PM -0800, Vinicius Costa Gomes wrote:
> I wanted it so using PCIe PTM was transparent to applications, so adding
> another API wouldn't be my preference.
> 
> That being said, having a trigger from the application to start/stop the
> PTM cycles doesn't sound too bad an idea. So, not too opposed to this
> idea.
> 
> Richard, any opinions here?

Sorry, I only have the last two message from this thread, and so I'm
missing the backstory.

Richard