[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CADvbK_dZzdqGsDw1yr7e8ic+xgsJfB+dbA-P+nPTnvq_kWqSCw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 14 Nov 2020 13:26:29 +0800
From: Xin Long <lucien.xin@...il.com>
To: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@...il.com>
Cc: network dev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, linux-sctp@...r.kernel.org,
davem <davem@...emloft.net>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com>,
Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] sctp: change to hold/put transport for proto_unreach_timer
On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 8:35 PM Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
<marcelo.leitner@...il.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 05:18:24PM +0800, Xin Long wrote:
> ...
> > diff --git a/net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c b/net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c
> > index 813d307..0a51150 100644
> > --- a/net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c
> > +++ b/net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c
> > @@ -419,7 +419,7 @@ void sctp_generate_proto_unreach_event(struct timer_list *t)
> > /* Try again later. */
> > if (!mod_timer(&transport->proto_unreach_timer,
> > jiffies + (HZ/20)))
> > - sctp_association_hold(asoc);
> > + sctp_transport_hold(transport);
> > goto out_unlock;
> > }
> >
>
> The chunk above covers the socket busy case, but for the normal cases
> it also needs:
>
> @@ -435,7 +435,7 @@ void sctp_generate_proto_unreach_event(struct timer_list *t)
>
> out_unlock:
> bh_unlock_sock(sk);
> - sctp_association_put(asoc);
> + sctp_transport_put(asoc);
> }
yeah, right, posted v2.
Thanks.
>
> /* Handle the timeout of the RE-CONFIG timer. */
>
> > diff --git a/net/sctp/transport.c b/net/sctp/transport.c
> > index 806af58..60fcf31 100644
> > --- a/net/sctp/transport.c
> > +++ b/net/sctp/transport.c
> > @@ -133,7 +133,7 @@ void sctp_transport_free(struct sctp_transport *transport)
> >
> > /* Delete the ICMP proto unreachable timer if it's active. */
> > if (del_timer(&transport->proto_unreach_timer))
> > - sctp_association_put(transport->asoc);
> > + sctp_transport_put(transport);
> >
> > sctp_transport_put(transport);
>
> Btw, quite noticeable on the above list of timers that only this timer
> was using a reference on the asoc. Seems we're good now, then. :-)
>
correct! :D
Powered by blists - more mailing lists