netdev - Re: [RESEND,net-next,PATCH v5 0/3] Fix inefficiences and rename nla

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 16 Nov 2020 09:22:47 -0800
From:   Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To:     laniel_francis@...vacyrequired.com
Cc:     linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        davem@...emloft.net, keescook@...omium.org
Subject: Re: [RESEND,net-next,PATCH v5 0/3] Fix inefficiences and rename
 nla_strlcpy

On Sun, 15 Nov 2020 18:08:03 +0100 laniel_francis@...vacyrequired.com
wrote:
> This patch set answers to first three issues listed in:
> https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/110
> 
> To sum up, the patch contributions are the following:
> 1. the first patch fixes an inefficiency where some bytes in dst were written
> twice, one with 0 the other with src content.
> 2. The second one modifies nla_strlcpy to return the same value as strscpy,
> i.e. number of bytes written or -E2BIG if src was truncated.
> It also modifies code that calls nla_strlcpy and checks for its return value.
> 3. The third renames nla_strlcpy to nla_strscpy.
> 
> Unfortunately, I did not find how to create struct nlattr objects so I tested
> my modifications on simple char* and with GDB using tc to get to
> tcf_proto_check_kind.
> 
> If you see any way to improve the code or have any remark, feel free to comment.
> 
> 
> Best regards and take care of yourselves.

Applied, thank you!