netdev - [PATCH bpf-next v6 18/34] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for arraymap maps

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20201117034108.1186569-19-guro@fb.com>
Date:   Mon, 16 Nov 2020 19:40:52 -0800
From:   Roman Gushchin <guro@...com>
To:     <bpf@...r.kernel.org>
CC:     <ast@...nel.org>, <daniel@...earbox.net>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        <andrii@...nel.org>, <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        <linux-mm@...ck.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <kernel-team@...com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v6 18/34] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for arraymap maps

Do not use rlimit-based memory accounting for arraymap maps.
It has been replaced with the memcg-based memory accounting.

Signed-off-by: Roman Gushchin <guro@...com>
Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>
---
 kernel/bpf/arraymap.c | 24 ++++--------------------
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/bpf/arraymap.c b/kernel/bpf/arraymap.c
index 92b650123c22..20f751a1d993 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/arraymap.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/arraymap.c
@@ -81,11 +81,10 @@ int array_map_alloc_check(union bpf_attr *attr)
 static struct bpf_map *array_map_alloc(union bpf_attr *attr)
 {
 	bool percpu = attr->map_type == BPF_MAP_TYPE_PERCPU_ARRAY;
-	int ret, numa_node = bpf_map_attr_numa_node(attr);
+	int numa_node = bpf_map_attr_numa_node(attr);
 	u32 elem_size, index_mask, max_entries;
 	bool bypass_spec_v1 = bpf_bypass_spec_v1();
-	u64 cost, array_size, mask64;
-	struct bpf_map_memory mem;
+	u64 array_size, mask64;
 	struct bpf_array *array;
 
 	elem_size = round_up(attr->value_size, 8);
@@ -126,44 +125,29 @@ static struct bpf_map *array_map_alloc(union bpf_attr *attr)
 		}
 	}
 
-	/* make sure there is no u32 overflow later in round_up() */
-	cost = array_size;
-	if (percpu)
-		cost += (u64)attr->max_entries * elem_size * num_possible_cpus();
-
-	ret = bpf_map_charge_init(&mem, cost);
-	if (ret < 0)
-		return ERR_PTR(ret);
-
 	/* allocate all map elements and zero-initialize them */
 	if (attr->map_flags & BPF_F_MMAPABLE) {
 		void *data;
 
 		/* kmalloc'ed memory can't be mmap'ed, use explicit vmalloc */
 		data = bpf_map_area_mmapable_alloc(array_size, numa_node);
-		if (!data) {
-			bpf_map_charge_finish(&mem);
+		if (!data)
 			return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
-		}
 		array = data + PAGE_ALIGN(sizeof(struct bpf_array))
 			- offsetof(struct bpf_array, value);
 	} else {
 		array = bpf_map_area_alloc(array_size, numa_node);
 	}
-	if (!array) {
-		bpf_map_charge_finish(&mem);
+	if (!array)
 		return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
-	}
 	array->index_mask = index_mask;
 	array->map.bypass_spec_v1 = bypass_spec_v1;
 
 	/* copy mandatory map attributes */
 	bpf_map_init_from_attr(&array->map, attr);
-	bpf_map_charge_move(&array->map.memory, &mem);
 	array->elem_size = elem_size;
 
 	if (percpu && bpf_array_alloc_percpu(array)) {
-		bpf_map_charge_finish(&array->map.memory);
 		bpf_map_area_free(array);
 		return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
 	}
-- 
2.26.2