[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <878sb0wg04.fsf@cloudflare.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2020 09:21:15 +0100
From: Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@...udflare.com>
To: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>
Cc: ast@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [bpf PATCH v3 5/6] bpf, sockmap: Handle memory acct if skb_verdict prog redirects to self
On Mon, Nov 16, 2020 at 11:29 PM CET, John Fastabend wrote:
> If the skb_verdict_prog redirects an skb knowingly to itself, fix your
> BPF program this is not optimal and an abuse of the API please use
> SK_PASS. That said there may be cases, such as socket load balancing,
> where picking the socket is hashed based or otherwise picks the same
> socket it was received on in some rare cases. If this happens we don't
> want to confuse userspace giving them an EAGAIN error if we can avoid
> it.
>
> To avoid double accounting in these cases. At the moment even if the
> skb has already been charged against the sockets rcvbuf and forward
> alloc we check it again and do set_owner_r() causing it to be orphaned
> and recharged. For one this is useless work, but more importantly we
> can have a case where the skb could be put on the ingress queue, but
> because we are under memory pressure we return EAGAIN. The trouble
> here is the skb has already been accounted for so any rcvbuf checks
> include the memory associated with the packet already. This rolls
> up and can result in unecessary EAGAIN errors in userspace read()
> calls.
>
> Fix by doing an unlikely check and skipping checks if skb->sk == sk.
>
> Fixes: 51199405f9672 ("bpf: skb_verdict, support SK_PASS on RX BPF path")
> Signed-off-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>
> ---
> net/core/skmsg.c | 8 ++++++++
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/net/core/skmsg.c b/net/core/skmsg.c
> index 9aed5a2c7c5b..514bc9f6f8ae 100644
> --- a/net/core/skmsg.c
> +++ b/net/core/skmsg.c
> @@ -442,11 +442,19 @@ static int sk_psock_skb_ingress_enqueue(struct sk_buff *skb,
> return copied;
> }
>
> +static int sk_psock_skb_ingress_self(struct sk_psock *psock, struct sk_buff *skb);
> +
> static int sk_psock_skb_ingress(struct sk_psock *psock, struct sk_buff *skb)
> {
> struct sock *sk = psock->sk;
> struct sk_msg *msg;
>
> + /* If we are receiving on the same sock skb->sk is already assigned,
> + * skip memory accounting and owner transition seeing it already set
> + * correctly.
> + */
> + if (unlikely(skb->sk == sk))
> + return sk_psock_skb_ingress_self(psock, skb);
> msg = sk_psock_create_ingress_msg(sk, skb);
> if (!msg)
> return -EAGAIN;
Reviewed-by: Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@...udflare.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists