netdev - Re: [PATCH][next] mwifiex: Fix fall-through warnings for Clang

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20201117163235.GA23802@embeddedor>
Date:   Tue, 17 Nov 2020 10:32:35 -0600
From:   "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@...nel.org>
To:     Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc:     Amitkumar Karwar <amitkarwar@...il.com>,
        Ganapathi Bhat <ganapathi.bhat@....com>,
        Xinming Hu <huxinming820@...il.com>,
        Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH][next] mwifiex: Fix fall-through warnings for Clang

On Tue, Nov 17, 2020 at 08:15:59AM -0800, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Tue, 2020-11-17 at 10:09 -0600, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> > In preparation to enable -Wimplicit-fallthrough for Clang, fix multiple
> > warnings by explicitly adding multiple break statements instead of
> > letting the code fall through to the next case.
> 
> Thanks Gustavo.
> 
> I think this is better style than the gcc allowed
> undescribed fallthrough to break;
> 
> gcc developers disagree though:
> 
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91432

Yeah; I mention that in this[1] changelog text, together with the
reasons why we think the Clang approach is safer. which is exactly
the same information contained in the link[2] included in the changelog
text for this commit.

--
Gustavo

[1] https://git.kernel.org/linus/4169e889e5889405d54cec27d6e9f7f0ce3c7096
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/115