lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201117184954.GV917484@nvidia.com>
Date:   Tue, 17 Nov 2020 14:49:54 -0400
From:   Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>
To:     Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
CC:     Parav Pandit <parav@...dia.com>, Saeed Mahameed <saeed@...nel.org>,
        "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org" <linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>,
        "gregkh@...uxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Jiri Pirko <jiri@...dia.com>,
        "dledford@...hat.com" <dledford@...hat.com>,
        Leon Romanovsky <leonro@...dia.com>,
        "davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 00/13] Add mlx5 subfunction support

On Tue, Nov 17, 2020 at 09:11:20AM -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote:

> > Just to refresh all our memory, we discussed and settled on the flow
> > in [2]; RFC [1] followed this discussion.
> > 
> > vdpa tool of [3] can add one or more vdpa device(s) on top of already
> > spawned PF, VF, SF device.
> 
> Nack for the networking part of that. It'd basically be VMDq.

What are you NAK'ing? 

It is consistent with the multi-subsystem device sharing model we've
had for ages now.

The physical ethernet port is shared between multiple accelerator
subsystems. netdev gets its slice of traffic, so does RDMA, iSCSI,
VDPA, etc.

Jason

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ