[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201117143847.2040f609@kicinski-fedora-PC1C0HJN.hsd1.ca.comcast.net>
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2020 14:38:47 -0800
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Vadim Fedorenko <vfedorenko@...ek.ru>
Cc: Boris Pismenny <borisp@...dia.com>,
Aviad Yehezkel <aviadye@...dia.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [net] net/tls: missing received data after fast remote close
On Sun, 15 Nov 2020 14:43:48 +0300 Vadim Fedorenko wrote:
> In case when tcp socket received FIN after some data and the
> parser haven't started before reading data caller will receive
> an empty buffer.
This is pretty terse, too terse for me to understand..
> This behavior differs from plain TCP socket and
> leads to special treating in user-space. Patch unpauses parser
> directly if we have unparsed data in tcp receive queue.
Sure, but why is the parser paused? Does it pause itself on FIN?
> diff --git a/net/tls/tls_sw.c b/net/tls/tls_sw.c
> index 2fe9e2c..4db6943 100644
> --- a/net/tls/tls_sw.c
> +++ b/net/tls/tls_sw.c
> @@ -1289,6 +1289,9 @@ static struct sk_buff *tls_wait_data(struct sock *sk, struct sk_psock *psock,
> struct sk_buff *skb;
> DEFINE_WAIT_FUNC(wait, woken_wake_function);
>
> + if (!ctx->recv_pkt && skb_queue_empty(&sk->sk_receive_queue))
> + __strp_unpause(&ctx->strp);
> +
> while (!(skb = ctx->recv_pkt) && sk_psock_queue_empty(psock)) {
> if (sk->sk_err) {
> *err = sock_error(sk);
Powered by blists - more mailing lists