netdev - [PATCH bpf-next v3 08/10] samples/bpf: use recvfrom() in xdpsock/l2fwd

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20201119083024.119566-9-bjorn.topel@gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 19 Nov 2020 09:30:22 +0100
From:   Björn Töpel <bjorn.topel@...il.com>
To:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Björn Töpel <bjorn.topel@...el.com>,
        magnus.karlsson@...el.com, ast@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net,
        maciej.fijalkowski@...el.com, sridhar.samudrala@...el.com,
        jesse.brandeburg@...el.com, qi.z.zhang@...el.com, kuba@...nel.org,
        edumazet@...gle.com, jonathan.lemon@...il.com, maximmi@...dia.com
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v3 08/10] samples/bpf: use recvfrom() in xdpsock/l2fwd

From: Björn Töpel <bjorn.topel@...el.com>

Start using recvfrom() the l2fwd scenario, instead of poll() which is
more expensive and need additional knobs for busy-polling.

Signed-off-by: Björn Töpel <bjorn.topel@...el.com>
---
 samples/bpf/xdpsock_user.c | 25 +++++++++++--------------
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/samples/bpf/xdpsock_user.c b/samples/bpf/xdpsock_user.c
index f90111b95b2e..24aa7511c4c8 100644
--- a/samples/bpf/xdpsock_user.c
+++ b/samples/bpf/xdpsock_user.c
@@ -1098,8 +1098,7 @@ static void kick_tx(struct xsk_socket_info *xsk)
 	exit_with_error(errno);
 }
 
-static inline void complete_tx_l2fwd(struct xsk_socket_info *xsk,
-				     struct pollfd *fds)
+static inline void complete_tx_l2fwd(struct xsk_socket_info *xsk)
 {
 	struct xsk_umem_info *umem = xsk->umem;
 	u32 idx_cq = 0, idx_fq = 0;
@@ -1134,7 +1133,7 @@ static inline void complete_tx_l2fwd(struct xsk_socket_info *xsk,
 				exit_with_error(-ret);
 			if (xsk_ring_prod__needs_wakeup(&umem->fq)) {
 				xsk->app_stats.fill_fail_polls++;
-				ret = poll(fds, num_socks, opt_timeout);
+				recvfrom(xsk_socket__fd(xsk->xsk), NULL, 0, MSG_DONTWAIT, NULL, NULL);
 			}
 			ret = xsk_ring_prod__reserve(&umem->fq, rcvd, &idx_fq);
 		}
@@ -1331,19 +1330,19 @@ static void tx_only_all(void)
 		complete_tx_only_all();
 }
 
-static void l2fwd(struct xsk_socket_info *xsk, struct pollfd *fds)
+static void l2fwd(struct xsk_socket_info *xsk)
 {
 	unsigned int rcvd, i;
 	u32 idx_rx = 0, idx_tx = 0;
 	int ret;
 
-	complete_tx_l2fwd(xsk, fds);
+	complete_tx_l2fwd(xsk);
 
 	rcvd = xsk_ring_cons__peek(&xsk->rx, opt_batch_size, &idx_rx);
 	if (!rcvd) {
 		if (xsk_ring_prod__needs_wakeup(&xsk->umem->fq)) {
 			xsk->app_stats.rx_empty_polls++;
-			ret = poll(fds, num_socks, opt_timeout);
+			recvfrom(xsk_socket__fd(xsk->xsk), NULL, 0, MSG_DONTWAIT, NULL, NULL);
 		}
 		return;
 	}
@@ -1353,7 +1352,7 @@ static void l2fwd(struct xsk_socket_info *xsk, struct pollfd *fds)
 	while (ret != rcvd) {
 		if (ret < 0)
 			exit_with_error(-ret);
-		complete_tx_l2fwd(xsk, fds);
+		complete_tx_l2fwd(xsk);
 		if (xsk_ring_prod__needs_wakeup(&xsk->tx)) {
 			xsk->app_stats.tx_wakeup_sendtos++;
 			kick_tx(xsk);
@@ -1388,22 +1387,20 @@ static void l2fwd_all(void)
 	struct pollfd fds[MAX_SOCKS] = {};
 	int i, ret;
 
-	for (i = 0; i < num_socks; i++) {
-		fds[i].fd = xsk_socket__fd(xsks[i]->xsk);
-		fds[i].events = POLLOUT | POLLIN;
-	}
-
 	for (;;) {
 		if (opt_poll) {
-			for (i = 0; i < num_socks; i++)
+			for (i = 0; i < num_socks; i++) {
+				fds[i].fd = xsk_socket__fd(xsks[i]->xsk);
+				fds[i].events = POLLOUT | POLLIN;
 				xsks[i]->app_stats.opt_polls++;
+			}
 			ret = poll(fds, num_socks, opt_timeout);
 			if (ret <= 0)
 				continue;
 		}
 
 		for (i = 0; i < num_socks; i++)
-			l2fwd(xsks[i], fds);
+			l2fwd(xsks[i]);
 
 		if (benchmark_done)
 			break;
-- 
2.27.0