netdev - RE: [PATCH net-next 0/2] enetc: Clean endianness warnings up

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <DB8PR04MB6764480610C5FC6311BB03BF96E00@DB8PR04MB6764.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Date:   Thu, 19 Nov 2020 10:18:00 +0000
From:   Claudiu Manoil <claudiu.manoil@....com>
To:     Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
CC:     "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: RE: [PATCH net-next 0/2] enetc: Clean endianness warnings up

>-----Original Message-----
>From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
[...]
>Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/2] enetc: Clean endianness warnings up
>
>On Wed, 18 Nov 2020 09:52:58 -0800 Jakub Kicinski wrote:
>> On Tue, 17 Nov 2020 20:20:02 +0200 Claudiu Manoil wrote:
>> > Cleanup patches to address the outstanding endianness issues
>> > in the driver reported by sparse.
>>
>> Build bot says this doesn't apply to net-next, could you double check?
>
>Hm, not sure what happened there, it does seem to apply now.
>
>Could you resend regardless? Would be good to get this build tested.

Reformatted and resent patches.