netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next V6] net: Variable SLAAC: SLAAC with prefixes of arbitrary length in PIO

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <175e1fdb250.1207dca53446410.2492811916841931466@shytyi.net>
Date:   Thu, 19 Nov 2020 20:31:41 +0100
From:   Dmytro Shytyi <dmytro@...tyi.net>
To:     "Jakub Kicinski" <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc:     "yoshfuji" <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>,
        "kuznet" <kuznet@....inr.ac.ru>,
        "liuhangbin" <liuhangbin@...il.com>, "davem" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        "netdev" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next V6] net: Variable SLAAC: SLAAC with prefixes of
 arbitrary length in PIO


---- On Thu, 19 Nov 2020 19:44:13 +0100 Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org> wrote ----

 > On Thu, 19 Nov 2020 14:37:35 +0100 Dmytro Shytyi wrote: 
 > > +struct inet6_ifaddr *ipv6_cmp_rcvd_prsnt_prfxs(struct inet6_ifaddr *ifp, 
 > > +                           struct inet6_dev *in6_dev, 
 > > +                           struct net *net, 
 > > +                           const struct prefix_info *pinfo) 
 > > +{ 
 > > +    struct inet6_ifaddr *result_base = NULL; 
 > > +    struct inet6_ifaddr *result = NULL; 
 > > +    struct in6_addr curr_net_prfx; 
 > > +    struct in6_addr net_prfx; 
 > > +    bool prfxs_equal; 
 > > + 
 > > +    result_base = result; 
 > > +    rcu_read_lock(); 
 > > +    list_for_each_entry_rcu(ifp, &in6_dev->addr_list, if_list) { 
 > > +        if (!net_eq(dev_net(ifp->idev->dev), net)) 
 > > +            continue; 
 > > +        ipv6_addr_prefix_copy(&net_prfx, &pinfo->prefix, pinfo->prefix_len); 
 > > +        ipv6_addr_prefix_copy(&curr_net_prfx, &ifp->addr, pinfo->prefix_len); 
 > > +        prfxs_equal = 
 > > +            ipv6_prefix_equal(&net_prfx, &curr_net_prfx, pinfo->prefix_len); 
 > > +        if (prfxs_equal && pinfo->prefix_len == ifp->prefix_len) { 
 > > +            result = ifp; 
 > > +            in6_ifa_hold(ifp); 
 > > +            break; 
 > > +        } 
 > > +    } 
 > > +    rcu_read_unlock(); 
 > > +    if (result_base != result) 
 > > +        ifp = result; 
 > > +    else 
 > > +        ifp = NULL; 
 > > + 
 > > +    return ifp; 
 > > +} 
 >  
 > Thanks for adding the helper! Looks like it needs a touch up: 
 
Understood. Thank you for pointing this out. I think I did not catch this warning as my Makefile didn't include "-Wmissing-prototypes"

 > net/ipv6/addrconf.c:2579:22: warning: no previous prototype for ‘ipv6_cmp_rcvd_prsnt_prfxs’ [-Wmissing-prototypes] 
 >  2579 | struct inet6_ifaddr *ipv6_cmp_rcvd_prsnt_prfxs(struct inet6_ifaddr *ifp, 
 >  |                      ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 
 > net/ipv6/addrconf.c:2579:21: warning: symbol 'ipv6_cmp_rcvd_prsnt_prfxs' was not declared. Should it be static? 
 > 

Hideaki Yoshifuji helped to improve this patch with suggestions. @Hideaki, should I add "Reported-by" tag in this case?
Jakub Kicinski also helped to find errors and help with improvement. @Jakub, should I add "Reported-by" tag in this case? 

Thanks,
Dmytro SHYTYI