netdev - Re: [PATCH v2] mdio_bus: suppress err message for reset gpio EPROBE

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <221941d6-2bb1-9be8-7031-08071a509542@gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 19 Nov 2020 23:09:52 +0100
From:   Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>
To:     Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc:     Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@...com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] mdio_bus: suppress err message for reset gpio
 EPROBE_DEFER

Am 19.11.2020 um 22:41 schrieb Andrew Lunn:
>>>> Doesn't checkpatch complain about line length > 80 here?
>>>
>>> :)
>>>
>>> commit bdc48fa11e46f867ea4d75fa59ee87a7f48be144
>>> Author: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
>>> Date:   Fri May 29 16:12:21 2020 -0700
>>>
>>>     checkpatch/coding-style: deprecate 80-column warning
>>>
>>
>> Ah, again something learnt. Thanks for the reference.
> 
> But it then got revoked for netdev. Or at least it was planned to
> re-impose 80 for netdev. I don't know if checkpatch got patched yet.
> 
> 	  Andrew
> 
At a first glance it sounds strange that subsystems may define own
rules for such basic things. But supposedly there has been a longer
emotional disucssion about this already ..