[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8eef085f2b4d565463d5251a4868c7aaa19bf6ab.camel@perches.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2020 14:16:20 -0800
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: bpf@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Daniel Borkmann <borkmann@...earbox.net>,
Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
Magnus Karlsson <magnus.karlsson@...el.com>,
Björn Töpel <bjorn.topel@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] MAINTAINERS: Update XDP and AF_XDP entries
On Thu, 2020-11-19 at 21:50 +0100, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
> On Thu, 19 Nov 2020 10:02:10 -0800
> Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 19 Nov 2020 18:26:40 +0100 Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
> > > Getting too many false positive matches with current use
> > > of the content regex K: and file regex N: patterns.
> > >
> > > This patch drops file match N: and makes K: more restricted.
> > > Some more normal F: file wildcards are added.
> > >
> > > Notice that AF_XDP forgot to some F: files that is also
> > > updated in this patch.
> > >
> > > Suggested-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
> > > Signed-off-by: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com>
> >
> > Ah! Sorry, I missed that you sent this before replying to Joe.
> >
> > Would you mind respining with his regex?
>
> Sure, I just send it... with your adjusted '(\b|_)xdp(\b|_)' regex, as
> it seems to do the same thing (and it works with egrep).
The regexes in MAINTAINERS are perl not egrep and using (\b|_)
creates unnecessary capture groups.
It _really_ should be (?:\b|_)xdp(?:\b|_)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists