[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <fe835089-3499-0d70-304e-cc3d2e58a8d8@badula.org>
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2020 18:41:03 -0500
From: Ion Badulescu <ionut@...ula.org>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, xiakaixu1987@...il.com
Cc: leon@...nel.org, davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Kaixu Xia <kaixuxia@...cent.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: adaptec: remove dead code in set_vlan_mode
On 11/20/20 6:17 PM, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Fri, 20 Nov 2020 15:50:00 +0800 xiakaixu1987@...il.com wrote:
>> From: Kaixu Xia <kaixuxia@...cent.com>
>>
>> The body of the if statement can be executed only when the variable
>> vlan_count equals to 32, so the condition of the while statement can
>> not be true and the while statement is dead code. Remove it.
>>
>> Reported-by: Tosk Robot <tencent_os_robot@...cent.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Kaixu Xia <kaixuxia@...cent.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/net/ethernet/adaptec/starfire.c | 9 ++-------
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/adaptec/starfire.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/adaptec/starfire.c
>> index 555299737b51..ad27a9fa5e95 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/adaptec/starfire.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/adaptec/starfire.c
>> @@ -1754,14 +1754,9 @@ static u32 set_vlan_mode(struct netdev_private *np)
>> filter_addr += 16;
>> vlan_count++;
>> }
>> - if (vlan_count == 32) {
>> + if (vlan_count == 32)
>> ret |= PerfectFilterVlan;
>> - while (vlan_count < 32) {
>> - writew(0, filter_addr);
>> - filter_addr += 16;
>> - vlan_count++;
>> - }
>> - }
>> +
>> return ret;
>> }
>> #endif /* VLAN_SUPPORT */
>
> This got broken back in 2011:
>
> commit 5da96be53a16a62488316810d0c7c5d58ce3ee4f
> Author: Jiri Pirko <jpirko@...hat.com>
> Date: Wed Jul 20 04:54:31 2011 +0000
>
> starfire: do vlan cleanup
>
> - unify vlan and nonvlan rx path
> - kill np->vlgrp and netdev_vlan_rx_register
>
> Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <jpirko@...hat.com>
> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
>
> The comparison to 32 was on a different variable before that change.
>
> Ion, do you think anyone is still using this driver?
>
> Maybe it's time we put it in the history book (by which I mean remove
> from the kernel).
Frankly, no, I don't know of any users, and that unfortunately includes
myself. I still have two cards in my stash, but they're 64-bit PCI-X, so
plugging them in would likely require taking a dremel to a 32-bit PCI
slot to make it open-ended. (They do work in a 32-bit slot.)
Anyway, that filter code could use some fixing in other regards. So
either we fix it properly (which I can submit a patch for), or clean it
out for good.
-Ion
Powered by blists - more mailing lists