[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <BY5PR12MB43226B04592F03E2D4E8A787DCFF0@BY5PR12MB4322.namprd12.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2020 03:34:24 +0000
From: Parav Pandit <parav@...dia.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Saeed Mahameed <saeed@...nel.org>
CC: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org" <linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>,
"gregkh@...uxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Jiri Pirko <jiri@...dia.com>,
"dledford@...hat.com" <dledford@...hat.com>,
Leon Romanovsky <leonro@...dia.com>,
"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: RE: [PATCH net-next 00/13] Add mlx5 subfunction support
> From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
> Sent: Friday, November 20, 2020 7:05 AM
>
> On Wed, 18 Nov 2020 22:12:22 -0800 Saeed Mahameed wrote:
> > > Right, devices of other subsystems are fine, I don't care.
> >
> > But a netdev will be loaded on SF automatically just through the
> > current driver design and modularity, since SF == VF and our netdev is
> > abstract and doesn't know if it runs on a PF/VF/SF .. we literally
> > have to add code to not load a netdev on a SF. why ? :/
>
> A netdev is fine, but the examples so far don't make it clear (to me) if it's
> expected/supported to spawn _multiple_ netdevs from a single "vdpa
> parentdev".
We do not create Netdev from vdpa parentdev.
>From vdpa parentdev, only vdpa device(s) are created which is 'struct device' residing in /sys/bus/vdpa/<device>.
Currently such vdpa device is already created on mlx5_vpa.ko driver load, however user has no way to inspect, stats, get/set features of this device, hence the vdpa tool.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists