[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201120001654.57cf3isbrm2lf3zl@kafai-mbp.dhcp.thefacebook.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2020 16:16:54 -0800
From: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>
To: unlisted-recipients:; (no To-header on input)
CC: <bpf@...r.kernel.org>, <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
<davem@...emloft.net>, <kuba@...nel.org>, <ast@...nel.org>,
<daniel@...earbox.net>, <yhs@...com>, <andrii@...nel.org>,
<kpsingh@...omium.org>, <revest@...gle.com>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/5] bpf: Add an iterator selftest for
bpf_sk_storage_delete
On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 05:26:53PM +0100, Florent Revest wrote:
> From: Florent Revest <revest@...gle.com>
>
> The eBPF program iterates over all entries (well, only one) of a socket
> local storage map and deletes them all. The test makes sure that the
> entry is indeed deleted.
Note that if there are many entries and seq->op->stop() is called (due to
seq_has_overflowed()). It is possible that not all of the entries will be
iterated (and deleted). However, I think it is a more generic issue in
resuming the iteration and not specific to this series.
Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists