[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201120182219.4f83557a@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.dhcp.thefacebook.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2020 18:22:19 -0800
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@...il.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org, daniel@...earbox.net,
kafai@...com, kernel-team@...com, edumazet@...gle.com,
brakmo@...com, alexanderduyck@...com, weiwan@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [net PATCH 0/2] tcp: Address issues with ECT0 not being set in
DCTCP packets
On Thu, 19 Nov 2020 13:23:43 -0800 Alexander Duyck wrote:
> This patch set is meant to address issues seen with SYN/ACK packets not
> containing the ECT0 bit when DCTCP is configured as the congestion control
> algorithm for a TCP socket.
>
> A simple test using "tcpdump" and "test_progs -t bpf_tcp_ca" makes the
> issue obvious. Looking at the packets will result in the SYN/ACK packet
> with an ECT0 bit that does not match the other packets for the flow when
> the congestion control agorithm is switch from the default. So for example
> going from non-DCTCP to a DCTCP congestion control algorithm we will see
> the SYN/ACK IPV6 header will not have ECT0 set while the other packets in
> the flow will. Likewise if we switch from a default of DCTCP to cubic we
> will see the ECT0 bit set in the SYN/ACK while the other packets in the
> flow will not.
Applied, thanks!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists