lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Sat, 21 Nov 2020 13:09:12 -0800
From:   Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     Jamie Iles <jamie@...iainc.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        Qiushi Wu <wu000273@....edu>,
        Jay Vosburgh <j.vosburgh@...il.com>,
        Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@...il.com>,
        Andy Gospodarek <andy@...yhouse.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv3] bonding: wait for sysfs kobject destruction before
 freeing struct slave

On Fri, 20 Nov 2020 16:39:51 +0100 Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 02:28:27PM +0000, Jamie Iles wrote:
> > syzkaller found that with CONFIG_DEBUG_KOBJECT_RELEASE=y, releasing a
> > struct slave device could result in the following splat:

> > This is a potential use-after-free if the sysfs nodes are being accessed
> > whilst removing the struct slave, so wait for the object destruction to
> > complete before freeing the struct slave itself.
> 
> Nice, it looks like it should have always been done this way!
> 
> Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

Applied to net, thanks!

Powered by blists - more mailing lists