[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201121154549.10f6fb7d@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.dhcp.thefacebook.com>
Date: Sat, 21 Nov 2020 15:45:49 -0800
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Lijun Pan <ljp@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, sukadev@...ux.ibm.com, drt@...ux.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 15/15] ibmvnic: add some debugs
On Fri, 20 Nov 2020 16:40:49 -0600 Lijun Pan wrote:
> From: Sukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev@...ux.ibm.com>
>
> We sometimes run into situations where a soft/hard reset of the adapter
> takes a long time or fails to complete. Having additional messages that
> include important adapter state info will hopefully help understand what
> is happening, reduce the guess work and minimize requests to reproduce
> problems with debug patches.
This doesn't qualify as a bug fix, please send it to net-next.
> + netdev_err(adapter->netdev,
> + "[S:%d FRR:%d WFR:%d] Done processing resets\n",
> + adapter->state, adapter->force_reset_recovery,
> + adapter->wait_for_reset);
Does reset only happen as a result of an error? Should this be a
netdev_info() instead?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists