netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 2/3] mlxsw: spectrum_ptp: use PTP wide message type definitions

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20201122143555.GA515025@shredder.lan>
Date:   Sun, 22 Nov 2020 16:35:55 +0200
From:   Ido Schimmel <idosch@...sch.org>
To:     Christian Eggers <ceggers@...i.de>
Cc:     Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>,
        Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
        Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>,
        Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Christian Eggers <ceggers@....de>,
        Petr Machata <petrm@...lanox.com>,
        Jiri Pirko <jiri@...dia.com>, Ido Schimmel <idosch@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 2/3] mlxsw: spectrum_ptp: use PTP wide message
 type definitions

On Sun, Nov 22, 2020 at 09:26:35AM +0100, Christian Eggers wrote:
> Use recently introduced PTP wide defines instead of a driver internal
> enumeration.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christian Eggers <ceggers@....de>
> Cc: Petr Machata <petrm@...lanox.com>
> Cc: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...dia.com>
> Cc: Ido Schimmel <idosch@...dia.com>

Reviewed-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@...dia.com>

But:

1. Checkpatch complains about:
WARNING: From:/Signed-off-by: email address mismatch: 'From: Christian Eggers <ceggers@...i.de>' != 'Signed-off-by: Christian Eggers <ceggers@....de>'

2. This series does not build, which fails the CI [1][2] and also
required me to fetch the dependencies that are currently under review
[3]. I believe it is generally discouraged to create dependencies
between patch sets that are under review for exactly these reasons. I
don't know what are Jakub's preferences, but had this happened on our
internal patchwork instance, I would just ask the author to submit
another version with all the patches.

Anyway, I added all six patches to our regression as we have some PTP
tests. Will let you know tomorrow.

Thanks

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20201122082636.12451-1-ceggers@arri.de/T/#mcef35858585d23b72b8f75450a51618d5c5d3260
[2] https://patchwork.hopto.org/static/nipa/389053/11923809/build_allmodconfig_warn/summary
[3] https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/cover/20201120084106.10046-1-ceggers@arri.de/