[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <335227b5-56e6-3312-d090-84d2fabff32b@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 22 Nov 2020 12:47:23 -0700
From: David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
To: Ido Schimmel <idosch@...sch.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: roopa@...dia.com, mlxsw@...dia.com,
Ido Schimmel <idosch@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH iproute2-next 0/2] ip: Nexthop flags extensions
On 11/19/20 6:57 AM, Ido Schimmel wrote:
> From: Ido Schimmel <idosch@...dia.com>
>
> Patch #1 prints the recently added 'RTNH_F_TRAP' flag.
>
> Patch #2 makes sure that nexthop flags are always printed for nexthop
> objects. Even when the nexthop does not have a device, such as a
> blackhole nexthop or a group.
>
> Example output with netdevsim:
>
> # ip nexthop
> id 1 via 192.0.2.2 dev eth0 scope link trap
> id 2 blackhole trap
> id 3 group 2 trap
>
> Example output with mlxsw:
>
> # ip nexthop
> id 1 via 192.0.2.2 dev swp3 scope link offload
> id 2 blackhole offload
> id 3 group 2 offload
>
> Tested with fib_nexthops.sh that uses "ip nexthop" output:
>
> Tests passed: 164
> Tests failed: 0
>
> Ido Schimmel (2):
> ip route: Print "trap" nexthop indication
> nexthop: Always print nexthop flags
>
> ip/ipnexthop.c | 3 +--
> ip/iproute.c | 2 ++
> 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
applied to iproute2-next, without preferential treatment.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists