netdev - Re: [PATCH net] netdevice.h: Fix unintentional disable of ALL_FOR

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 23 Nov 2020 18:15:11 +0200
From:   Tariq Toukan <ttoukan.linux@...il.com>
To:     Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        Tariq Toukan <tariqt@...dia.com>
Cc:     "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
        netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Moshe Shemesh <moshe@...dia.com>,
        Maxim Mikityanskiy <maximmi@...dia.com>,
        Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] netdevice.h: Fix unintentional disable of ALL_FOR_ALL
 features on upper device



On 11/23/2020 4:55 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 23, 2020 at 3:13 PM Tariq Toukan <tariqt@...dia.com> wrote:
>>
>> Calling netdev_increment_features() on upper/master device from
>> netdev_add_tso_features() implies unintentional clearance of ALL_FOR_ALL
>> features supported by all slaves.  Fix it by passing ALL_FOR_ALL in
>> addition to ALL_TSO.
>>
>> Fixes: b0ce3508b25e ("bonding: allow TSO being set on bonding master")
> 
> I think you should give more details to your bug report, because
> netdev_add_tso_features() is used from different
> places.
> 
> Thanks.
> 

Right. I'll include these in the re-spin:
Fixes: 247f6d0f8667 ("team: allow TSO being set on master")
Fixes: f902e8812ef6 ("bridge: Add ability to enable TSO")

I wonder though if netdev_increment_features() is expected to clear 
features that are not part of the mask.

Thanks.