[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20201123071230.676469-5-idosch@idosch.org>
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2020 09:12:24 +0200
From: Ido Schimmel <idosch@...sch.org>
To: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org, jiri@...dia.com,
dsahern@...il.com, mlxsw@...dia.com,
Ido Schimmel <idosch@...dia.com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next 04/10] mlxsw: spectrum_router: Resolve RIF from nexthop struct instead of neighbour
From: Ido Schimmel <idosch@...dia.com>
The two are the same, but for blackhole nexthops we will not have an
associated neighbour struct, so resolve the RIF from the nexthop struct
itself instead.
Signed-off-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@...dia.com>
Reviewed-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...dia.com>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum_router.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum_router.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum_router.c
index 53d04e7993f6..ef0e4e452f47 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum_router.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum_router.c
@@ -3284,7 +3284,7 @@ static int __mlxsw_sp_nexthop_update(struct mlxsw_sp *mlxsw_sp, u32 adj_index,
mlxsw_reg_ratr_pack(ratr_pl, MLXSW_REG_RATR_OP_WRITE_WRITE_ENTRY,
true, MLXSW_REG_RATR_TYPE_ETHERNET,
- adj_index, neigh_entry->rif);
+ adj_index, nh->rif->rif_index);
mlxsw_reg_ratr_eth_entry_pack(ratr_pl, neigh_entry->ha);
if (nh->counter_valid)
mlxsw_reg_ratr_counter_pack(ratr_pl, nh->counter_index, true);
--
2.28.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists