netdev - RE: [PATCH] libbpf: add support for canceling cached

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 23 Nov 2020 10:43:08 +0000
From:   "Li,Rongqing" <lirongqing@...du.com>
To:     Magnus Karlsson <magnus.karlsson@...il.com>
CC:     Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] libbpf: add support for canceling cached_cons advance



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Magnus Karlsson [mailto:magnus.karlsson@...il.com]
> Sent: Monday, November 23, 2020 5:40 PM
> To: Li,Rongqing <lirongqing@...du.com>
> Cc: Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>; bpf
> <bpf@...r.kernel.org>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] libbpf: add support for canceling cached_cons advance
> 
> On Sun, Nov 22, 2020 at 2:21 PM Li RongQing <lirongqing@...du.com> wrote:
> >
> > It is possible to fail receiving packets after calling
> > xsk_ring_cons__peek, at this condition, cached_cons has been advanced,
> > should be cancelled.
> 
> Thanks RongQing,
> 
> I have needed this myself in various situations, so I think we should add this.
> But your motivation in the commit message is somewhat confusing. How about
> something like this?
> 
> Add a new function for returning descriptors the user received after an
> xsk_ring_cons__peek call. After the application has gotten a number of
> descriptors from a ring, it might not be able to or want to process them all for
> various reasons. Therefore, it would be useful to have an interface for returning
> or cancelling a number of them so that they are returned to the ring. This patch
> adds a new function called xsk_ring_cons__cancel that performs this operation
> on nb descriptors counted from the end of the batch of descriptors that was
> received through the peek call.
> 
> Replace your commit message with this, fix the bug below, send a v2 and then I
> am happy to ack this.


Thank you very much
> 
> /Magnus
> 
> > Signed-off-by: Li RongQing <lirongqing@...du.com>
> > ---
> >  tools/lib/bpf/xsk.h | 6 ++++++
> >  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/xsk.h b/tools/lib/bpf/xsk.h index
> > 1069c46364ff..4128215c246b 100644
> > --- a/tools/lib/bpf/xsk.h
> > +++ b/tools/lib/bpf/xsk.h
> > @@ -153,6 +153,12 @@ static inline size_t xsk_ring_cons__peek(struct
> xsk_ring_cons *cons,
> >         return entries;
> >  }
> >
> > +static inline void xsk_ring_cons__cancel(struct xsk_ring_cons *cons,
> > +                                        size_t nb) {
> > +       rx->cached_cons -= nb;
> 
> cons-> not rx->. Please make sure the v2 compiles and passes checkpatch.
> 

Sorry for building error
I will send V2

Thanks 

-Li


> > +}
> > +
> >  static inline void xsk_ring_cons__release(struct xsk_ring_cons *cons,
> > size_t nb)  {
> >         /* Make sure data has been read before indicating we are done
> > --
> > 2.17.3
> >