[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201124094916.GD1551@shell.armlinux.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2020 09:49:16 +0000
From: Russell King - ARM Linux admin <linux@...linux.org.uk>
To: Ido Schimmel <idosch@...sch.org>
Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: sfp: add debugfs support
On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 10:41:51AM +0200, Ido Schimmel wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 01:14:31AM +0100, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 23, 2020 at 10:06:16PM +0000, Russell King wrote:
> > > Add debugfs support to SFP so that the internal state of the SFP state
> > > machines and hardware signal state can be viewed from userspace, rather
> > > than having to compile a debug kernel to view state state transitions
> > > in the kernel log. The 'state' output looks like:
> > >
> > > Module state: empty
> > > Module probe attempts: 0 0
> > > Device state: up
> > > Main state: down
> > > Fault recovery remaining retries: 5
> > > PHY probe remaining retries: 12
> > > moddef0: 0
> > > rx_los: 1
> > > tx_fault: 1
> > > tx_disable: 1
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@...linux.org.uk>
> >
> > Hi Russell
> >
> > This looks useful. I always seem to end up recompiling the kernel,
> > which as you said, this should avoid.
>
> FWIW, another option is to use drgn [1]. Especially when the state is
> queried from the kernel and not hardware. We are using that in mlxsw
> [2][3].
Presumably that requires /proc/kcore support, which 32-bit ARM doesn't
have.
--
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTP is here! 40Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists