[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1606214969-97849-1-git-send-email-linyunsheng@huawei.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2020 18:49:27 +0800
From: Yunsheng Lin <linyunsheng@...wei.com>
To: <peterz@...radead.org>, <mingo@...hat.com>, <will@...nel.org>,
<viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>, <kyk.segfault@...il.com>,
<davem@...emloft.net>, <kuba@...nel.org>, <linmiaohe@...wei.com>,
<martin.varghese@...ia.com>, <pabeni@...hat.com>,
<pshelar@....org>, <fw@...len.de>, <gnault@...hat.com>,
<steffen.klassert@...unet.com>, <vladimir.oltean@....com>,
<edumazet@...gle.com>, <saeed@...nel.org>
CC: <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linuxarm@...wei.com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next v3 0/2] Add an assert in napi_consume_skb()
This patch introduces a lockdep_assert_in_softirq() interface and
uses it to assert the case when napi_consume_skb() is not called in
the softirq context.
Changelog:
V3: add comment to emphasize the ambiguous semantics
V2: Use lockdep instead of one-off Kconfig knob
Yunsheng Lin (2):
lockdep: Introduce in_softirq lockdep assert
net: Use lockdep_assert_in_softirq() in napi_consume_skb()
include/linux/lockdep.h | 8 ++++++++
net/core/skbuff.c | 2 ++
2 files changed, 10 insertions(+)
--
2.8.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists