netdev - Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] ath10k: add option for chip-id based BDF selection

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAD=FV=XKCLgL6Bt+3KfqKByyP5fpwXOh6TNHXAoXkaQJRzjKjQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 23 Nov 2020 16:56:38 -0800
From:   Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
To:     Abhishek Kumar <kuabhs@...omium.org>
Cc:     Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>,
        Rakesh Pillai <pillair@...eaurora.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        ath10k <ath10k@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Brian Norris <briannorris@...omium.org>,
        linux-wireless <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] ath10k: add option for chip-id based BDF selection

Hi,

On Thu, Nov 12, 2020 at 12:09 PM Abhishek Kumar <kuabhs@...omium.org> wrote:
>
> In some devices difference in chip-id should be enough to pick
> the right BDF. Add another support for chip-id based BDF selection.
> With this new option, ath10k supports 2 fallback options.
>
> The board name with chip-id as option looks as follows
> board name 'bus=snoc,qmi-board-id=ff,qmi-chip-id=320'
>
> Tested-on: WCN3990 hw1.0 SNOC WLAN.HL.3.2.2-00696-QCAHLSWMTPL-1
> Tested-on: QCA6174 HW3.2 WLAN.RM.4.4.1-00157-QCARMSWPZ-1
> Signed-off-by: Abhishek Kumar <kuabhs@...omium.org>
> ---
>
> (no changes since v1)

I think you need to work on the method you're using to generate your
patches.  There are most definitely changes since v1.  You described
them in your cover letter (which you don't really need for a singleton
patch) instead of here.


> @@ -1438,12 +1439,17 @@ static int ath10k_core_create_board_name(struct ath10k *ar, char *name,
>         }
>
>         if (ar->id.qmi_ids_valid) {
> -               if (with_variant && ar->id.bdf_ext[0] != '\0')
> +               if (with_additional_params && ar->id.bdf_ext[0] != '\0')
>                         scnprintf(name, name_len,
>                                   "bus=%s,qmi-board-id=%x,qmi-chip-id=%x%s",
>                                   ath10k_bus_str(ar->hif.bus),
>                                   ar->id.qmi_board_id, ar->id.qmi_chip_id,
>                                   variant);
> +               else if (with_additional_params)
> +                       scnprintf(name, name_len,
> +                                 "bus=%s,qmi-board-id=%x,qmi-chip-id=%x",
> +                                 ath10k_bus_str(ar->hif.bus),
> +                                 ar->id.qmi_board_id, ar->id.qmi_chip_id);

I believe this is exactly opposite of what Rakesh was requesting.
Specifically, he was trying to eliminate the extra scnprintf() but I
think he still agreed that it was a good idea to generate 3 different
strings.  I believe the proper diff to apply to v1 is:

https://crrev.com/c/255643

-Doug