| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2020 10:08:09 -0800
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, mptcp@...ts.01.org,
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] mptcp: be careful on MPTCP-level ack.
On Tue, 24 Nov 2020 12:20:11 +0100 Paolo Abeni wrote:
> -static void mptcp_send_ack(struct mptcp_sock *msk, bool force)
> +static inline bool tcp_can_send_ack(const struct sock *ssk)
> +{
> + return !((1 << inet_sk_state_load(ssk)) &
> + (TCPF_SYN_SENT | TCPF_SYN_RECV | TCPF_TIME_WAIT | TCPF_CLOSE));
> +}
Does the compiler really not inline this trivial static function?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists