netdev - Re: [PATCH net 1/2] devlink: Hold rtnl lock while reading netdev attributes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 24 Nov 2020 14:29:10 -0800
From:   Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To:     Parav Pandit <parav@...dia.com>
Cc:     <davem@...emloft.net>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <jiri@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 1/2] devlink: Hold rtnl lock while reading netdev
 attributes

On Sun, 22 Nov 2020 08:12:56 +0200 Parav Pandit wrote:
> A netdevice of a devlink port can be moved to different
> net namespace than its parent devlink instance.
> This scenario occurs when devlink reload is not used for
> maintaining backward compatibility.
> 
> When netdevice is undergoing migration to net namespace,
> its ifindex and name may change.
> 
> In such use case, devlink port query may read stale netdev
> attributes.
> 
> Fix it by reading them under rtnl lock.
> 
> Fixes: bfcd3a466172 ("Introduce devlink infrastructure")
> Signed-off-by: Parav Pandit <parav@...dia.com>
> ---
>  net/core/devlink.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++------
>  1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/net/core/devlink.c b/net/core/devlink.c
> index acc29d5157f4..6135ef5972ce 100644
> --- a/net/core/devlink.c
> +++ b/net/core/devlink.c
> @@ -775,6 +775,23 @@ devlink_nl_port_function_attrs_put(struct sk_buff *msg, struct devlink_port *por
>  	return err;
>  }
>  
> +static int devlink_nl_port_netdev_fill(struct sk_buff *msg, struct devlink_port *devlink_port)
> +{
> +	struct net_device *netdev = devlink_port->type_dev;
> +	int err;
> +
> +	ASSERT_RTNL();
> +	if (!netdev)
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	err = nla_put_u32(msg, DEVLINK_ATTR_PORT_NETDEV_IFINDEX, netdev->ifindex);

The line wrapping was correct, please keep in under 80. Please tell
your colleges at Mellanox.

> +	if (err)
> +		goto done;

	return err;

> +	err = nla_put_string(msg, DEVLINK_ATTR_PORT_NETDEV_NAME, netdev->name);

	return nla_put_...

> +done:
> +	return err;
> +}
> +
>  static int devlink_nl_port_fill(struct sk_buff *msg, struct devlink *devlink,
>  				struct devlink_port *devlink_port,
>  				enum devlink_command cmd, u32 portid,
> @@ -792,6 +809,8 @@ static int devlink_nl_port_fill(struct sk_buff *msg, struct devlink *devlink,
>  	if (nla_put_u32(msg, DEVLINK_ATTR_PORT_INDEX, devlink_port->index))
>  		goto nla_put_failure;
>  
> +	/* Hold rtnl lock while accessing port's netdev attributes. */
> +	rtnl_lock();
>  	spin_lock_bh(&devlink_port->type_lock);
>  	if (nla_put_u16(msg, DEVLINK_ATTR_PORT_TYPE, devlink_port->type))
>  		goto nla_put_failure_type_locked;
> @@ -800,13 +819,10 @@ static int devlink_nl_port_fill(struct sk_buff *msg, struct devlink *devlink,
>  			devlink_port->desired_type))
>  		goto nla_put_failure_type_locked;
>  	if (devlink_port->type == DEVLINK_PORT_TYPE_ETH) {
> -		struct net_device *netdev = devlink_port->type_dev;
> +		int err;

What's the point of this local variable?

> -		if (netdev &&
> -		    (nla_put_u32(msg, DEVLINK_ATTR_PORT_NETDEV_IFINDEX,
> -				 netdev->ifindex) ||
> -		     nla_put_string(msg, DEVLINK_ATTR_PORT_NETDEV_NAME,
> -				    netdev->name)))
> +		err = devlink_nl_port_netdev_fill(msg, devlink_port);
> +		if (err)

just put the call in the if ()

>  			goto nla_put_failure_type_locked;
>  	}
>  	if (devlink_port->type == DEVLINK_PORT_TYPE_IB) {


Honestly this patch is doing too much for a fix.

All you need is the RTNL lock and then add:

+               struct net *net = devlink_net(devlink_port->devlink);
                struct net_device *netdev = devlink_port->type_dev;
 
                if (netdev &&
+                   net_eq(net, dev_net(netdev)) &&
                    (nla_put_u32(msg, DEVLINK_ATTR_PORT_NETDEV_IFINDEX,
                                 netdev->ifindex) ||
                     nla_put_string(msg, DEVLINK_ATTR_PORT_NETDEV_NAME,


You can do refactoring later in net-next. Maybe even add a check that
drivers which support reload set namespace local on their netdevs.