[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201125105943.GG25562@amd>
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2020 11:59:43 +0100
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To: Alexander Dahl <ada@...rsis.com>
Cc: linux-leds@...r.kernel.org, Marek Behun <marek.behun@....cz>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Alexander Dahl <post@...pocky.de>
Subject: Re: Request for Comment: LED device naming for netdev LEDs
Hi!
> > > What are your ideas about this problem?
> > >
> > > Marek
> >
> > BTW option b) and c) can be usable if we create a new utility, ledtool,
> > to report infromation about LEDs and configure LEDs.
> >
> > In that case it does not matter if the LED is named
> > ethernet-adapter0:red:activity
> > or
> > ethernet-phy0:red:activity
> > because this new ledtool utility could just look deeper into sysfs to
> > find out that the LED corresponds to eth0, whatever it name is.
>
> I like the idea to have such a tool. What do you have in mind? Sounds for me
> like it would be somehow similar to libgpiod with gpio* for GPIO devices or
> like libevdev for input devices or like mtd-utils …
>
> Especially a userspace library could be helpful to avoid reinventing the wheel
> on userspace developer side?
>
> Does anyone else know prior work for linux leds sysfs interface from
> userspace?
I have code in tui project which accesses the LEDs from python... and
I started writing ledtool in rust.
Anyway, I agree we should provide shared library, too. Going through
the fork/exec is just too ugly.
Best regards,
Pavel
--
http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (182 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists