[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201125125240.59e29a4e@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.dhcp.thefacebook.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2020 12:52:40 -0800
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Dany Madden <drt@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, sukadev@...ux.ibm.com, ljp@...ux.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2 3/9] ibmvnic: avoid memset null scrq msgs
On Mon, 23 Nov 2020 18:57:51 -0500 Dany Madden wrote:
> scrq->msgs could be NULL during device reset, causing Linux to crash.
> So, check before memset scrq->msgs.
>
> Fixes: c8b2ad0a4a901 ("ibmvnic: Sanitize entire SCRQ buffer on reset")
>
> Signed-off-by: Dany Madden <drt@...ux.ibm.com>
Thanks for the Fixes tags! Please remove the empty lines between the
Fixes tags and sign-offs, and make sure the Fixes lines are not wrapped
(e.g. in patch 9).
> Signed-off-by: Lijun Pan <ljp@...ux.ibm.com>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/ibmvnic.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/ibmvnic.c
> index d5a927bb4954..e84255c2fc72 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/ibmvnic.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/ibmvnic.c
> @@ -2844,16 +2844,26 @@ static int reset_one_sub_crq_queue(struct ibmvnic_adapter *adapter,
> struct ibmvnic_sub_crq_queue *scrq)
> {
> int rc;
> + if (!scrq) {
Looks like a missing new line between variable declaration and code.
Not sure why checkpatch doesn't catch this.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists