[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKwvOdna5Zj_O=sB7Q0jHZX0BJSaakX=ZyftwQ_3=L3-ZB54XQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2020 14:09:29 -0800
From: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>
To: Finn Thain <fthain@...egraphics.com.au>
Cc: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
"Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@...nel.org>,
Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, alsa-devel@...a-project.org,
linux-atm-general@...ts.sourceforge.net,
reiserfs-devel@...r.kernel.org, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org,
linux-wireless <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org,
dri-devel <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@...il.com>,
linux-ide@...r.kernel.org, dm-devel@...hat.com,
keyrings@...r.kernel.org, linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org,
GR-everest-linux-l2@...vell.com, wcn36xx@...ts.infradead.org,
samba-technical@...ts.samba.org, linux-i3c@...ts.infradead.org,
linux1394-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
linux-afs@...ts.infradead.org,
usb-storage@...ts.one-eyed-alien.net, drbd-dev@...ts.linbit.com,
devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, linux-cifs@...r.kernel.org,
rds-devel@....oracle.com, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org, oss-drivers@...ronome.com,
bridge@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
amd-gfx list <amd-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com, cluster-devel@...hat.com,
linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, coreteam@...filter.org,
intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org, linux-input@...r.kernel.org,
Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>,
tipc-discussion@...ts.sourceforge.net, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org,
selinux@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-msm <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-geode@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-can@...r.kernel.org, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, op-tee@...ts.trustedfirmware.org,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org,
nouveau@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-hams@...r.kernel.org,
ceph-devel@...r.kernel.org,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org,
"maintainer:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT)" <x86@...nel.org>,
linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org, GR-Linux-NIC-Dev@...vell.com,
Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-decnet-user@...ts.sourceforge.net, linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org,
Linux-Renesas <linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-sctp@...r.kernel.org, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org,
"open list:HARDWARE RANDOM NUMBER GENERATOR CORE"
<linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org>, patches@...nsource.cirrus.com,
linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org, target-devel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org,
Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>,
Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH 000/141] Fix fall-through warnings for Clang
On Wed, Nov 25, 2020 at 1:33 PM Finn Thain <fthain@...egraphics.com.au> wrote:
>
> Or do you think that a codebase can somehow satisfy multiple checkers and
> their divergent interpretations of the language spec?
Have we found any cases yet that are divergent? I don't think so. It
sounds to me like GCC's cases it warns for is a subset of Clang's.
Having additional coverage with Clang then should ensure coverage for
both.
> > This is not a shiny new warning; it's already on for GCC and has existed
> > in both compilers for multiple releases.
> >
>
> Perhaps you're referring to the compiler feature that lead to the
> ill-fated, tree-wide /* fallthrough */ patch series.
>
> When the ink dries on the C23 language spec and the implementations figure
> out how to interpret it then sure, enforce the warning for new code -- the
> cost/benefit analysis is straight forward. However, the case for patching
> existing mature code is another story.
I don't think we need to wait for the ink to dry on the C23 language
spec to understand that implicit fallthrough is an obvious defect of
the C language. While the kernel is a mature codebase, it's not
immune to bugs. And its maturity has yet to slow its rapid pace of
development.
--
Thanks,
~Nick Desaulniers
Powered by blists - more mailing lists