[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201125152742.05800094@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.dhcp.thefacebook.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2020 15:27:42 -0800
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Denis Kirjanov <kda@...ux-powerpc.org>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net/af_unix: don't create a path for a binded socket
On Tue, 24 Nov 2020 15:24:21 +0300 Denis Kirjanov wrote:
> in the case of the socket which is bound to an adress
> there is no sense to create a path in the next attempts
> diff --git a/net/unix/af_unix.c b/net/unix/af_unix.c
> index 41c3303c3357..fd76a8fe3907 100644
> --- a/net/unix/af_unix.c
> +++ b/net/unix/af_unix.c
> @@ -1021,7 +1021,7 @@ static int unix_bind(struct socket *sock, struct sockaddr *uaddr, int addr_len)
>
> err = -EINVAL;
> if (addr_len < offsetofend(struct sockaddr_un, sun_family) ||
> - sunaddr->sun_family != AF_UNIX)
> + sunaddr->sun_family != AF_UNIX || u->addr)
> goto out;
>
> if (addr_len == sizeof(short)) {
> @@ -1049,10 +1049,6 @@ static int unix_bind(struct socket *sock, struct sockaddr *uaddr, int addr_len)
> if (err)
> goto out_put;
>
> - err = -EINVAL;
> - if (u->addr)
> - goto out_up;
> -
> err = -ENOMEM;
> addr = kmalloc(sizeof(*addr)+addr_len, GFP_KERNEL);
> if (!addr)
Well, after your change the check on u->addr is no longer protected by
u->bindlock. Is that okay?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists