lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 26 Nov 2020 19:09:22 +0100
From:   Guillaume Nault <gnault@...hat.com>
To:     David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>,
        Russell Strong <russell@...ong.id.au>
Subject: [PATCH net] ipv4: Fix tos mask in inet_rtm_getroute()

When inet_rtm_getroute() was converted to use the RCU variants of
ip_route_input() and ip_route_output_key(), the TOS parameters
stopped being masked with IPTOS_RT_MASK before doing the route lookup.

As a result, "ip route get" can return a different route than what
would be used when sending real packets.

For example:

    $ ip route add 192.0.2.11/32 dev eth0
    $ ip route add unreachable 192.0.2.11/32 tos 2
    $ ip route get 192.0.2.11 tos 2
    RTNETLINK answers: No route to host

But, packets with TOS 2 (ECT(0) if interpreted as an ECN bit) would
actually be routed using the first route:

    $ ping -c 1 -Q 2 192.0.2.11
    PING 192.0.2.11 (192.0.2.11) 56(84) bytes of data.
    64 bytes from 192.0.2.11: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.173 ms

    --- 192.0.2.11 ping statistics ---
    1 packets transmitted, 1 received, 0% packet loss, time 0ms
    rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.173/0.173/0.173/0.000 ms

This patch re-applies IPTOS_RT_MASK in inet_rtm_getroute(), to
return results consistent with real route lookups.

Fixes: 3765d35ed8b9 ("net: ipv4: Convert inet_rtm_getroute to rcu versions of route lookup")
Signed-off-by: Guillaume Nault <gnault@...hat.com>
---
 net/ipv4/route.c | 7 ++++---
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/ipv4/route.c b/net/ipv4/route.c
index dc2a399cd9f4..9f43abeac3a8 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/route.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/route.c
@@ -3222,7 +3222,7 @@ static int inet_rtm_getroute(struct sk_buff *in_skb, struct nlmsghdr *nlh,
 
 	fl4.daddr = dst;
 	fl4.saddr = src;
-	fl4.flowi4_tos = rtm->rtm_tos;
+	fl4.flowi4_tos = rtm->rtm_tos & IPTOS_RT_MASK;
 	fl4.flowi4_oif = tb[RTA_OIF] ? nla_get_u32(tb[RTA_OIF]) : 0;
 	fl4.flowi4_mark = mark;
 	fl4.flowi4_uid = uid;
@@ -3246,8 +3246,9 @@ static int inet_rtm_getroute(struct sk_buff *in_skb, struct nlmsghdr *nlh,
 		fl4.flowi4_iif = iif; /* for rt_fill_info */
 		skb->dev	= dev;
 		skb->mark	= mark;
-		err = ip_route_input_rcu(skb, dst, src, rtm->rtm_tos,
-					 dev, &res);
+		err = ip_route_input_rcu(skb, dst, src,
+					 rtm->rtm_tos & IPTOS_RT_MASK, dev,
+					 &res);
 
 		rt = skb_rtable(skb);
 		if (err == 0 && rt->dst.error)
-- 
2.21.3

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ